Settle an argument online — with an actual (AI) judge
Every group chat has one: an argument that will not die because there is no referee. Who should do the dishes, who was late, whose turn it is to pay for bubble tea. Verdict gives that argument a courtroom. You describe the dispute, submit your side of the story, and send the case link to the other party.
The key rule: statements are sealed. Neither side can see what the other wrote until the trial. That keeps it honest — no rebutting, no adjusting your story after reading theirs. When both statements are in, court convenes: the gavel drops and the AI judge reads out the ruling.
The verdict is built to be shared. You get a mock-formal case title, a responsibility split (say, 70/30), a savage-but-fair ruling that quotes your own words back at you, one screenshot-ready quotable line, and a reconciliation order. Save it as an image and @ the loser in the group chat.
If the other party is too scared to show up, you can request a trial in absentia — the judge rules on the available evidence and docks the empty chair for not appearing. Free during beta, no account, works in any phone browser, in English, 简体中文, Español and 日本語.
FAQ
Is the AI judge actually fair?
It judges only the two statements you submit, assigns a responsibility split that adds up to 100%, and is prompted to be witty but even-handed. It is entertainment, not legal advice.
Can the other person see my statement before answering?
No. Statements are sealed until the verdict — neither party can read the other side before the trial.
What if the other person never responds?
You can request a trial in absentia. The judge rules with only your statement on record and notes the other party failed to appear.
Does it cost anything?
No. Verdict is free during beta, with no account and no download.